add a test for coverage of configuration validation of plugins used at HLT - #51295
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51295/49906 |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master. It involves the following packages:
@Martin-Grunewald, @cmsbuild, @mmusich can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
|
+hlt |
cmsbuild
added
hlt-approved
fully-signed
and removed
hlt-pending
pending-signatures
labels
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 |
…ationCoverage add a test for coverage of configuration validation of plugins used at HLT
3 participants
PR description:
Title says it all. To make sure we don't accumulate more cases as the one included at #47275.
PR validation:
scram b runtests_test_PluginConfigValidationCoverageruns for both:CMSSW_20_1_X_2026-06-23-1100(succeeds)CMSSW_20_1_X_2026-06-22-2300(fails because it's missing Provide configuration descriptions to MTD local reconstruction modules #51273)when this commit is cherry-picked.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport, no backport needed.